Showing posts with label Fantasy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fantasy. Show all posts

Monday, January 23, 2017

Alternate Facts, Day Four**

Spicer: "Finally, the president issued a memorandum outlining executive branch hiring. This memorandum counters through dramatic expansion of the federal workforce in recent years. " (sic)
Non-alternate fact: the work force decreased under the 44th President, especially compared to population growth.
From OPM.gov, civilian employees, executive branch:
1981: 2.8 million
1989: 3.1 million
1993: 2.9 million
2001: 2.6 million
2009: 2.8 million
2014: 2.7 million *most recent data, 2016 estimate is also 2.7 million
CF, US population:
1981: 229 million
1989: 247 million
1993: 260 million
2001: 285 million
2009: 307 million
2014: 318 million
2016: 323 million
Population per Federal civilian employee
1981: 82
1989: 80
1993: 90
2001: 110
2009: 110
2014: 118
2016: 120

** Or Day One, depending on who's counting.


Friday, August 7, 2015

Iran Deal: SEN Chuck Schumer Demands a Unicorn

Senator Chuck Schumer (D - NY) has stated he will oppose the P5+1 deal halting and rolling back efforts by Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. https://medium.com/@SenSchumer/my-position-on-the-iran-deal-e976b2f13478  Why? Well, centrally he says: "First, inspections are not “anywhere, anytime” and "Even more troubling is the fact that the U.S. cannot demand inspections unilaterally. "

That's right, Senator, Iran is not going to let foreign inspectors walk into ANY location in Iran, at ANY time, at the sole say-so and direction of its chief global opponent. What country, not prostrate after a total war, would allow that? You, sir, have asked for a unicorn. Under the deal, the IAEA inspections are extremely rigorous, more so than in any other country. Real arms control experts have said it is nearly impossible for Iran to have a nuclear weapons program under this deal. http://www.vox.com/2015/7/15/8967147/iran-nuclear-deal-jeffrey-lewis  The level of inspections demanded by Schumer are unneccessary and tantamount to granting the CIA an open door into the entire Iranian government, economy, and society. After the 1953 CIA-backed coup, the Iranians would never agree to that.

Senator Schumer's standards for the key goals under this agreement are fanciful. He might as well ask for a unicorn.

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Transient Gems

Minneapolis got 2 inches (5 cm) of light, fluffy snow this afternoon. Now, under the streetlights and full moon, it is as if every surface was dusted with a thousand small fairy gems, with shimmers and reflections. Added bonus: the snow squeaks underfoot!

Monday, June 16, 2014

Book Review: The Atrocity Archives, by Charles Stross


This was the second book I've read by British SF/Fantasy author Charlie Stross, the first being The Family Trade.  The Atrocity Archives has two stories, "The Atrocity Archives" and "The Concrete Jungle", both featuring darkside hacker Bob Howard and his (mis-)adventures in The Laundry, a super-secret UK agency struggling to hold back the Lovecraftian apocalypse.

The Atrocity Archives is a better effort by Stross than Family Trade, largely because the stories hang together better, and there are fewer moments where a discontinuity or mistake jarred me out of the text. Perhaps that's because Atrocity Archives posits multiple universes, not just two like Family Trade, and differences in larger policy and law can be ascribed to the central universe in the story not being this one. 

Stross notes that one of his inspirations, besides the obvious one of H.P. Lovecraft (and if you haven't read Lovecraft, you will be confused by  Atrocity Archives), is spy thriller master Len Deighton. The inspiration is clear; so clear, in fact, much as reading Lovecraft is a must before picking up this book, reading Deighton's spy fiction is a brief detour that I would highly recommend.

I have read a later Laundry story by Stross as well. His writing improves, in no small part because in the later story ("Equoid") Stross emphasizes the bureaucratic hurdles before his hero Bob Howard as much or more than the supernatural foe.  It is the humor that Stross brings out in the absurdity of bureaucratic business-as-usual while attending to the urgent business of throwing back the forces of darkness that sets The Laundry apart from the usual spy or horror tale.

Wednesday, June 4, 2014

Book Review: The Family Trade, by Charles Stross.


Incomplete. Simply put, this novel, the first in a series by UK SF author Charles Stross, is incomplete, in two senses. First, it simply ends after 300 pages, with no resolution of any plot elements. Some  research reveals that Stross asked his publisher to split The Merchant Princes trilogy into six books. So the book just stops, mid-story.

The "Family" " Trades" in a particular high-value item (which I'll call "Substance A"). The author again leaves his book incomplete by utterly failing to explain how the Family obtains its supply of  Substance A in the first place. The omission is all the more curious as Stross has the Family rejecting trade in another high-value item as there is no feasible way to obtain it - yet, the same obstacles (and more besides) should also be in the way of the Family getting Substance A as well. Sure, this is a fantasy or SF novel - but the Ferengi of ST:DS9 had an explanation for their trading business. Even Cyrano Jones had a back story for the tribbles.

Skipping over some minor factual and continuity quibbles - I still wonder why there were four pages of what appears to be another story all-together around page 200. In the old days, I'd guess it was a publisher's mistake - it really HAD stuck four pages of somebody else's manuscript into the text. Now? No clue. It is as if Tolkein broke away from The Two Towers for four pages from an Agatha Christie novel. Meanwhile, the protagonist's first challenge is merely discarded after she meets up with the "Family", even though the two challenges could have been played off each other.

The blurb compares Stross to Roger Zelazny, H. Beam Piper and Philip Jose Farmer. If you haven't read those authors, read them instead of this. If you have ... don't let the comparison get your hopes up.